Search results : 1153
Refine your search| IRIS 2009-2:1/18 [FR] “Marius” and “Cosette” Declared Lawful Sequels to Victor Hugo’s “Les Misérables” | |
|---|---|
|
In France, authors enjoy the right to respect for their name, their status and their work. This right is perpetual, inalienable and not subject to limitation. It is transmitted to his successors on the death of the author (Art. L. 121-1 of the Intellectual Property Code). It is on the basis of infringement of the moral right of his predecessor that Victor Hugo’s heir lost his appeal against the author and editor of two sequels to Les Misérables . He claimed that these novels spoiled the famous writer’s work - the social context in which their action takes place is substantially different from that... |
|
| IRIS 2009-2:1/17 [FR] TF1 Newscaster Sued for Libel | |
|
The presenter of TF1’s 1 o’clock news has been sued for public libel by the French society for the defence of tradition, family and property (TFP). When presenting a news item on the annual report of the inter-ministerial mission for vigilance and combating sects (Miviludes), the newscaster described as fraud the commercial practices of an association acknowledged in the report as being a sect, the name of which was revealed in the report that followed. The court in Paris had no difficulty in recognising that this constituted libel, which is defined in Article 29 of the Freedom of the Press Act... |
|
| IRIS 2009-2:1/1 European Court of Human Rights: case of Leroy v. France | |
|
In 2002, the French cartoonist Denis Leroy (pseudonym Guezmer) was convicted for complicity in condoning terrorism because of a cartoon published in a Basque weekly newspaper Ekaitza. On 11 September 2001, the cartoonist submitted to the magazine’s editorial team a drawing representing the attack on the twin towers of the World Trade Centre, with a caption which parodied the advertising slogan of a famous brand: “We have all dreamt of it... Hamas did it” (Cfr. “Sony did it”). The drawing was published in the magazine on 13 September 2001. In its next issue, the magazine... |
|
| IRIS 2009-1:1/37 Court of First Instance: TFI Case against the Commission | |
|
The Court of First Instance has dismissed TF1’s action for the annulment of the Commission’s decision classifying certain measures adopted by the French Republic in favour of the public television stations France 2 and France 3 as State aid compatible with the common market, due to its legal team’s procedural mishaps. TF1’s claims have been ongoing since 1993. In 1993, Télévision française 1 SA (TF1), owners of the private French television network TF1, launched a complaint to the European Commission concerning the methods of funding of two French public channels, France 2 and France 3. TF1 argued... |
|
| IRIS 2009-1:1/21 [FR] Change to Conditions for Broadcasting Cinema Films on Television | |
|
The Decree of 17 January 1990 laying down the general principles for television service editors broadcasting cinematographic and audiovisual works was amended on 28 November 2008. The text, which prohibited the showing of cinematographic works on Wednesday and Friday evenings, all day Saturday, and after 8.30 pm on Sunday, in order to protect exploitation in cinema theatres, has been rendered more flexible. Those television channels other than cinema or pay-per-view services whose agreements or lists of missions and duties provide that they are to devote a proportion of their turnover to expenditure... |