Search results : 1153
Refine your search| IRIS 2010-4:1/24 [FR] CSA Report on Combating Racism in the Audiovisual Media | |
|---|---|
|
In a report submitted to the Prime Minister at the end of January and published on 15 February 2010, the Conseil Supérieur de l'Audiovisuel (audiovisual regulatory body - CSA) has drawn up an assessment of its actions in addressing racism and anti-Semitism in the audiovisual media. The CSA had also been asked to present its observations on community media and to propose action for international cooperation. In an international context featuring increased racial and religious tension and its wide media coverage, the CSA notes that regulation and sanctions up to now have proved effective and speedy.... |
|
| IRIS 2010-4:1/23 [FR] CSA Lays down Conditions for Product Placement on Television | |
|
After consulting the professionals concerned, the Conseil Supérieur de l'Audiovisuel (audiovisual regulatory body - CSA) published a deliberation on 5 March 2010 laying down the conditions for authorising product placement on television, in accordance with Article 14-1 of the Act of 30 September 1986 as amended by the Act of 05 March 2009 transposing the AVMS Directive into national legislation. The text begins by defining the term ‘product placement’ as “placement in return for monetary consideration, i.e., the contractual supply of goods or services with a brand name that is identifiable within... |
|
| IRIS 2010-4:1/22 [FR] CSA Imposes new Form of Sanction on Channels | |
|
For the first time ever, in a decision of 9 March 2010, the Conseil Supérieur de l'Audiovisuel (audiovisual regulatory body - CSA) ordered two channels (TF1 and Canal +) to read out a statement on air apologising for their failure to meet the obligation of rigour in information. Under the terms of their agreement with the CSA, the channels subscribe to an obligation of honesty with regard to information. The CSA is responsible for ensuring observance of these undertakings and may, “in all cases of failure to comply with the obligations incumbent on the editors of audiovisual communication services,... |
|
| IRIS 2010-3:1/23 [FR] CNC Called on to Review its System for Financing Digitisation of Cinema Theatres | |
|
On 1 February 2010, the competition authority (Autorité de la Concurrence) delivered its opinion on the support arrangements being proposed by the national centre for cinematography (Centre National de la Cinématographie - CNC) for financing the digitalisation of cinema theatres. Until now, this cost has been shared between operators, who bear the cost of the investments, and distributors, who mainly reap the benefits of digitisation. They then pass on to the operators part of the savings they have achieved, through private “third-party investors”, thereby enabling them to finance some of their... |
|
| IRIS 2010-3:1/22 [FR] CSA Able to Sanction a Channel that Fails to Comply with Legislation on the Protection of Intellectual Property | |
|
The Conseil d’Etat has just delivered an extremely interesting decision on an issue that, to our knowledge, has given rise to few disputes. A television channel that had retransmitted live without authorisation a programme on the debates between the Socialist Party’s candidates for the presidential election being broadcast on the parliamentary channel had been ordered by the Conseil Supérieur de l'Audiovisuel (audiovisual regulatory body - CSA) to comply in future with the terms of Article 2-2-3 of its agreement, according to which the editor is required to comply with France’s legislation on intellectual... |