Search results : 1372
Refine your searchIRIS 2014-3:1/12 [DE] Federal Supreme Court Allows Link between Product Sales and Competition in TV Advertisement | |
---|---|
In a ruling of 12 December 2013 (case no. I ZR 192/12), the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court - BGH) decided that linking a competition to the sale of sweets in a television advertisement was admissible, provided the diligence requirement set out in Article 3(2)(3) of the Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (Unfair Competition Act - UWG) did not apply, since the advertisement was aimed not only at minors. The case concerned a TV commercial for a competition in which customers had to purchase the advertised sweets in order to take part. The advertisement showed the presenter Thomas Gottschalk... |
|
IRIS 2014-3:1/11 [DE] FFG Film Levy Consistent With Constitution | |
In a decision of 28 January 2014, the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court - BVerfG) confirmed that the provisions of the Filmförderungsgesetz (Film Support Act - FFG) concerning the film levy were in conformity with the Constitution. The BVerfG explained, first of all, that the Federal Government was responsible for legislation on the collection of the film levy according to Articles 72 and 74(1)(11) of the Grundgesetz (Basic Law - GG). Opponents of the levy had argued that it fell under cultural legislation, for which the Länder were responsible. However, the BVerfG ruled that... |
|
IRIS 2014-3:1/2 European Court of Human Rights: Tierbefreier E.V. v. Germany | |
Tierbefreier E.V. is an association based in Germany that militates in favour animal rights. A court decision prevented the association from disseminating film footage, which was secretly taken by a journalist on the premises of a company performing experiments on animals for the pharmaceutical industry (C. company). The journalist used his footage to produce documentary films of different lengths, critically commenting on the way in which laboratory animals were treated. His films, or extracts from them, were shown on different TV channels. Largely based on the journalist’s footage, Tierbefreier... |
|
IRIS 2014-2:1/14 [DE] Düsseldorf District Court Rejects Claim Based on Fraudulent-Filesharing Caution | |
In a decision of 8 October 2013, the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf (Düsseldorf District Court - AG) ruled that a claim based on an out-of-court settlement was unenforceable because it had been preceded by a fraudulent-filesharing caution and its enforcement was incompatible with the defence of bad faith. At the rightsholders’ request, a law firm specialising in copyright had informed the defendant that her Internet connection had been used to make 537 copyright-protected music files available for download. As the connection owner, she was obliged to reimburse the legal prosecution costs even if she had... |
|
IRIS 2014-2:1/13 [DE] Use of Image for Third-Party Advertising Breaches Own Image Rights | |
Ruling on an appeal, on 5 November 2013 (case no. 15 U 44/13), the Oberlandesgericht Köln (Cologne Appeal Court - OLG) decided that an actress’s own image rights can be breached if a picture from a film is used in an electrical chain store’s advertising brochure without the necessary permission. The OLG therefore confirmed the ruling of the Landgericht Köln (Cologne District Court - LG) of 20 February 2013 (case no. 28 O 431/12). An action had been brought after a picture of the actress appeared in an electrical chain store’s advertising brochure. A double-page spread in the brochure showed three... |