Search results : 1372
Refine your searchIRIS 2000-10:1/21 [DE] Cable Operator Must Revise Cable Allocation | |
---|---|
The dispute between the Sächsische Landesanstalt für privaten Rundfunk und neue Medien (Saxony Land Authority for Independent Broadcasting and New Media - SLM) and cable network operator PrimaCom over cable allocations in Leipzig is, for the time being, being kept out of court. Targeting several hundred households in Leipzig on an experimental basis, PrimaCom had moved several freely-available independent channels such as ProSieben, RTL 2 and VOX from its analogue package to its digital subscription service. This had aroused fierce protests from the selected households and broadcasters. The SLM... |
|
IRIS 2000-9:1/13 [DE] Monopolies Commission Investigates ARD and ZDF Complaint against Telekom | |
Following a joint complaint by ARD and ZDF, the Bundeskartellamt (Federal Monopolies Commission) is investigating whether Deutsche Telekom AG is abusing its dominant market position with respect to contracts governing the feeding of programmes into the cable network. The complaint centres on the fact that Telekom has an agreement with broadcasters exempting it from paying any copyright on the programmes carried on its network. In addition, Telekom demands a fee for public service channels to be included on the cable network. The Regulierungsbehörde für Telekommunikation und Post (Regulatory Authority... |
|
IRIS 2000-9:1/12 [DE] Stuttgart Appeal Court Ends Gross/Net Dispute | |
On 5 September 2000 the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Stuttgart Appeal Court - OLG) ended the lawsuit between the ARD (Union of German Public Service Broadcasters) and ProSieben Media AG without reaching a verdict (see IRIS 1998-3: 6). The European Court of Justice preliminary ruling, made at the OLG's request, led both parties to declare that their dispute was over (see IRIS 1999-7: 6 and IRIS 1999-10: 5). The Court, which therefore only had to decide what costs were due, concluded that the costs cancelled each other out, since it was not clear which side would have won the case if it had been... |
|
IRIS 2000-9:1/11 [DE] Court Rules on Claim to Right of Reply | |
On 8 June 2000, the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Stuttgart Regional Court of Appeal - OLG) rejected an appeal against a decision by the Landgericht Stuttgart (Stuttgart District Court - LG). The LG Stuttgart had rejected the applicant's claim that the defendant should be obliged to broadcast a reply. The OLG upheld this decision with particular reference to the fact that the reply had not been sent to the defendant immediately. Section 10.3.3 of the SWR-Staatsvertrag (SWR State Agreement), on which the right of reply was founded, stipulates that a demand for a reply to be broadcast need only be... |
|
IRIS 2000-9:1/10 [DE] Bremen Cable Allocation Monopoly Dispute Resolved | |
In a judgement of 28 August 2000, the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court - BVerwG) dismissed complaints against the decision taken by the Oberverwaltungsgericht der Freien Hansestadt Bremen (Bremen Higher Administrative Court - OVG) on 14 September 1999, in which it decided not to revise cable allocation regulations in Bremen. The Bremen OVG had upheld the regulations and practice of cable allocation in Bremen after a complaint was lodged by a private cable network operator (see IRIS 2000-1: 9). The BVerwG based its decision primarily on the fact that the complaints did not... |