Search results : 1394

Refine your search
Results display : Short Long
IRIS 2008-8:1/13 [DE] Supreme Court Rejects Copyright Fee on Duplicators

In a ruling issued on 17 July 2008, the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court - BGH) decided that CD/DVD duplicators were not subject to a copyright fee. The plaintiff, the Wort collecting society, which collects copyright fees for literary works, had demanded that the defendant, which sells such duplicators, pay a fee of EUR 1,227.10 per device sold. Duplicators can be used to copy data from CDs, CD-ROMs or DVDs without the use of a PC, but using burners. The plaintiff based its demand on Art. 54a para. 1 sentence 1 of the old version of the Urheberrechtsgesetz (Copyright Act - UrhG), since...

IRIS 2008-7:1/14 [DE] Breaches of the Ban on Surreptitious Advertising

The media authorities of the Länder (States) have recently noted several cases of surreptitious advertising on television and have initiated proceedings against the broadcasters concerned. Surreptitious advertising is defined in section 2(2)(6) of the Rundfunkstaatsvertrag (Inter-State Broadcasting Agreement) and is prohibited under the first sentence of section 7(6). After conducting a thorough investigation, in particular concerning the contractual relationships between the television station, the producer and the programme organiser, the Media Council of the Medienanstalt Berlin-Brandenburg...

IRIS 2008-7:1/13 [DE] Copyright also Applies in the Online World

In a judgment of 21 April 2008, the Landgericht Köln (Cologne Regional Court) ruled that copyright protected works can also be created in the context of the “Second Life” online platform. The case concerned a virtual model of Cologne Cathedral. The court stated that a work available on an online platform could also be protected by copyright if it could be classified as one of the types of works mentioned in section 2 of the Urhebergesetz (Copyright Act). As long as this classification was possible, there was, the court said, no need under this section to have recourse to the notion of a potentially...

IRIS 2008-7:1/12 [DE] Possibilities for Exploiting Sports Events

In a judgment dated 8 May 2008, the Stuttgart Regional Court ( Landgericht ) ruled that a video portal must not show film footage of amateur football games that fall within the responsibility of the Württemberg Football Association. The court stated that the association held all exploitation rights as a co-organiser of the games, justifying this view by referring to the financial risk borne by the organiser and to the latter’s responsibility for all the organisational aspects of a particular event. The fact that, inter alia , the Association organised the games, drew up the fixture lists, trained...

IRIS 2008-7:1/11 [DE] Extent of the Obligation to Identify a Provider

The courts are being repeatedly called upon to deal with issues relating to the identification of Internet providers. The reason for this lies in the requirements of section 5 of the Telemediengesetz (Telemedia Act – TMG), according to which service providers must keep certain easily recognisable information directly accessible and constantly available to commercial telemedia, which customers are normally offered against payment. According to section 5(1)(2) of the Telemedia Act, which transposes Article 5(1)(c) of Directive 2000/31/EC (“Directive on Electronic Commerce”) into German law, this...