Search results : 238
Refine your searchIRIS 2000-8:1/8 [BE] Demand for a European Ban on TV-Advertising Immediately Before and After Children's Programmes | |
---|---|
Since 1991 the Flemish Broadcasting legislation, with some modifications, stipulates a ban on advertising immediately before and after children's programmes. In a time period of 5 minutes before and after programmes targetting children under 12, no advertising or sponsorship messages are allowed. For many years the commercial broadcasting organisation VTM and its second channel Kanaal 2 have been opposed to this provision of the Broadcasting Decree and have sought the abrogation of the 5-minute rule. A decree proposed in the Flemish Parliament some months ago, however, went in the opposite direction... |
|
IRIS 2000-8:1/7 [BE] RTBF Pulls Out of Canal+ Belgique | |
The RTBF has been a shareholder in Canal+ Belgique ever since its launch in 1989. Indeed it was a requirement that all pay television companies were to allow the RTBF (either directly or through one of its subsidiaries) a capital holding of at least 26% or a blocking minority holding. At the end of 1999 it was announced that the Defi Group, one of the other Belgian shareholders in Canal+ Belgique, had sold its holding in the channel. The RTBF was then tempted to sell its holding at a comparable price in order to make extremely useful capital gains. In May 2000, Canal+ Benelux BV acquired the... |
|
IRIS 2000-7:1/8 [BE] Hidden Camera Infringes Right to Image | |
In a ruling of 19 May 2000, the Brussels Court of First Instance dealt with a case involving a hidden camera. On 2 October 1998 the applicant, Mrs P., had attended the recording of a talk-show on Flemish TV channel VTM, entitled "I'm looking for a millionaire", which concerned people attracted by money. Once the recording was officially over, the studio audience, including Mrs P., and the programme guests, including one man who was supposed to be a millionaire, had been invited by VTM for a drink. It was then that, by means of a hidden camera. Mrs P. had been filmed in conversation with the supposed... |
|
IRIS 2000-6:1/11 [BE] State Council and Flemish Media Authority VT4 Take Action concerning | |
On 17 February 1999 the Vlaams Commissariaat voor de Media (the Flemish Media Authority) decided that although VT4 operates under an ITC-licence in application of the British Broadcasting Act, VT4 in reality is established in the Flemish Community. VT4 was given until 15 September 1999 to request a licence as a Flemish broadcasting organisation and to conform to the media legislation of the Flemish Community (see IRIS 1999-3: 11 and IRIS 1999-6: 13). The decision of the Media Authority resulted from a complaint by VTM, the Flemish commercial TV-broadcaster, against VT4. At the request of VT4 the... |
|
IRIS 2000-6:1/10 [BE] Public- and Private-Sector Television Fined for Surreptitious Advertising | |
Since its installation in 1997, the Authorisation and Supervision Board of the regulatory body for the audiovisual sector (Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (CSA)) of the French-speaking Community had been very sparing in its use of the power to sanction which it holds by virtue of the Decree of 24 July 1997; only two - minorsanctions had been imposed in two and a half years, one against a radio station which had changed its broadcasting frequency without authorisation, and the other against RTL-TVI for broadcasting violent images during a news broadcast. In the space of just over one month, on... |