Search results : 503
Refine your search| IRIS 2007-7:1/28 [NL] Liberalisation and Clarification of Sponsorship Rules for Commercial and Public Service Broadcasters | |
|---|---|
|
The Dutch Media Authority is inter alia responsible for the practical implementation of broadcasting legislation. It fulfils this duty by means of instruments such as “policy rules”. It has recently amended existing policy rules concerning sponsorship of both commercial and public service broadcasters. Where commercial broadcasters are concerned, the Media Authority is seeking to create and promote a level playing field for the commercial television market. A number of innovations include the following: - The inclusion of the name or trademark (the latter includes logos) of a sponsor in the title... |
|
| IRIS 2007-7:1/27 [NL] Inclusion of Several Fragments of a Documentary in a PSB News Programme not in Breach of Copyright | |
|
The public service broadcaster TROS had included nine fragments, lasting a total of three minutes and 12 seconds, of a documentary entitled “China Blue” in one of its news programmes. The Dutch Film Fund, which holds an exclusive licence in respect of the documentary, took TROS to court claiming its copyright had been infringed. TROS argued before the court, on the grounds of several articles of the Dutch Copyright Act, that it had not acted in breach of the Fund’s rights in the documentary. The decisive argument was based on Article 15a of the Dutch Copyright Act, which allows a work to be quoted... |
|
| IRIS 2007-6:1/24 [NL] Changed Regime for Imposing Sanctions on Broadcasters | |
|
The Commissariaat voor de Media (Media Authority)has issued adapted policy rules concerning fines on broadcasters. The new fining system entered into force on 1 May 2007. Two innovations have been made with the introduction of a short-term fine and a so-called “repeat fine”: the first is the result of an accelerated procedure to swiftly sanction broadcasters in breach of their obligations, the second is intended for broadcasters who remain in violation of their obligations. A hearing is no longer required to impose the sanctions. The main reason behind these measures is that broadcasters - especially... |
|
| IRIS 2007-6:1/23 [NL] No More Separate Rules for Advertisements During Sports Events | |
|
As of 1 May 2007, the Commissariaat voor de Media (Media Authority) has repealed its set of policy rules known as the Sportregeling (Sports Regulation). The regulation was applicable to both public and commercial broadcasters and governed advertising practices in the ambit of sports events. The legal basis for this regulation was challenged in 2005 in a dispute before the highest Dutch administrative Court. The Raad van State (Council of State) found the policy rules compatible with the Mediawet (Media Act) but did rule that the Media Authority had erred by applying them too rigorously. Although... |
|
| IRIS 2007-6:1/22 [NL] Media Authority’s Ultimatum to Muslim Organisations: Cooperate or Lose Air Time | |
|
Six months remain for two bickering Dutch Muslim organisations with broadcasting ambitions to reach some form of compromise. Failing to do so will constitute a “serious risk” of losing their air time altogether. The Commissariaat voor de Media (Media Authority) issued the ultimatum stating that the lack of cooperation is incomprehensible in light of the fact that no change is necessary in terms of content. The Contactorgaan Moslims en Overheid (Contact Body Muslims and Government) and the Nederlandse Moslim Raad (Dutch Muslim Council) have refused to operate under the same flag since the air-time... |