Search results : 1524
Refine your search| IRIS 2002-3:1/11 [BE] VT4 Finally Established in the Flemish Community | |
|---|---|
|
By its decision of 15 February 2002, the Vlaams Commissariaat voor de Media (Flemish Media Authority) has decided to recognise the SBS-broadcasting station VT4 as a Flemish broadcasting organisation. From 1 March 2002, VT4 will operate under the Flemish Broadcasting Act 1995. VT4's licence from the Independent Television Commission (ITC) in the United Kingdom also ceased to be valid on 1 March 2002. Until recently, VT4, as a British broadcaster with its programmes targeting the Flemish Community, was operating with an ITC licence in accordance with the UK Broadcasting Act. Since February 1995,... |
|
| IRIS 2002-2:1/34 [YU] New Laws on Broadcasting and Telecommunications to Be Adopted Simultaneously? | |
|
The preparation of new media legislation for Serbia, which has already taken almost 15 months (see IRIS 2001-6: 10), is entering its last phases in early 2002. The draft Broadcasting Act of Serbia, which was submitted by the expert group to the Government of Serbia in August 2001, has finally reached the adoption procedure. The only remaining obstacle to a swift adoption of the Law on Broadcasting in the Parliament is the position of the Government of Serbia that the Law on Telecommunications of Serbia shall be passed simultaneously, and the text on telecommunications needs some time in order... |
|
| IRIS 2002-2:1/30 [DE] Federal Supreme Court Confirms Shock Advertising Ban | |
|
The Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court - BGH) has again ruled on the admissibility of so-called "shock advertising" under competition law. In its judgment of 6 December 2001, it prevented the defendant, a press firm, from printing an advertisement for the Benetton company, depicting a person labelled as "HIV Positive", on the grounds that it was immoral within the meaning of Article 1 of the Gesetz zum Schutz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (Unfair Competition Act - UWG) and was therefore unlawful. The BGH had reached the same verdict in a previous judgment of 6 July 1995 (I ZR 180/94).... |
|
| IRIS 2002-2:1/16 [FR] Amendment to the Decree of 27 March 1992 on Advertising and Sponsorship | |
|
In the context of the regulations adopted recently with a view to the launching of digital terrestriallybroadcast television, Decree no. 2001-1331 of 28 December 2001 has now extended the scope of the decree of 27 March 1992 "laying down the general principles for the scheme applicable to advertising and sponsorship" to all television services however they are broadcast (analog or digital, unencrypted or onpayment from users). It is intended to apply also to services other than television services broadcast terrestrially in digital mode (cable, satellite, encrypted channels). A new Article 15-1... |
|
| IRIS 2002-2:1/11 [ES] Ministry Issues Guidelines on TV Advertising Regulation | |
|
The Spanish regulation relating to television advertising can be found in Chapter III of Act 25/1994 on the incorporation into Spanish law of the EC "Television without Frontiers" Directive. In 2001, the European Commission initiated infringement proceedings against Spain for its poor application of the provisions of Directive 89/552/EEC dealing with television advertising (see IRIS 2001-4: 3). The national authority in charge of applying those provisions, the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (Ministry for Science and Technology), considered that in order to enforce them properly, it was necessary... |