Search results : 1510
Refine your search| IRIS 2011-9:1/28 [MT] Yes for Divorce Movement/Yes for Marriage v Broadcasting Authority | |
|---|---|
|
On 23 May 2011 the Civil Court, First Hall, sitting in its constitutional capacity, held that the Broadcasting Authority - by withholding two political spots from being broadcast during the divorce referendum campaign - was not in breach of freedom of expression under the Constitution of Malta and the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. No appeal was lodged against this judgment to the Constitutional Court. In Advocate Dr. Deborah Schembri and others in their personal name and on behalf of the Yes for Divorce Movement/Yes for Marriage, the said Yes Movement filed a freedom... |
|
| IRIS 2011-9:1/24 [IE] Updated Broadcasting Code on Referenda and Election Coverage | |
|
The Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI) on 13 September 2011 published an updated BAI Broadcasting Code on Referenda and Election Coverage (Election Code). The updated Election Code sets out rules with which all Irish broadcasters must comply when covering all relevant elections and polls (Referenda; General, Presidential, European and Local elections; Senate elections and By-elections) held in Ireland. The Broadcasting Act 2009 s.42 provides that the BAI shall prepare, and from time to time as occasion requires, revise codes governing standards and practice to be observed by broadcasters.... |
|
| IRIS 2011-9:1/23 [HU] Co-regulatory Agreements between the Hungarian Media Self-regulatory Bodies and the Media Authority | |
|
In July 2011, the Media Council of the Nemzeti Média és Hírközlési Hatóság (National Media and Infocommunications Authority - NMHH) concluded public administration agreements on media co-regulation with the four Hungarian media self-regulatory bodies: the Association of Hungarian Content Providers (MTE), the Advertising Self-regulatory Body (ÖRT), the Association of Hungarian Publishers (MLE) and the Association of Hungarian Electronic Broadcasters (MEME). According to Art. 190 of Act CLXXXV of 2010 on Media Services and Mass Media (Media Act; see IRIS 2011-2/30) “the Media Council shall have the... |
|
| IRIS 2011-9:1/22 [GB] Guidance on the Use of Digital Enhancements Re-Issued | |
|
On 27 July 2011, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled that two cosmetic advertisements were “misleading”. L’Oreal’s brands, Lancôme and Maybelline, were the object of adverse adjudications because “they could not demonstrate that images of Julia Roberts and Christy Turlington, which had been digitally enhanced, were an accurate representation of the results the products could achieve. As such we judged the ads were misleading.” Whilst the specific matter concerned magazine advertisements, misleading advertising is prohibited likewise under UK advertising rules applying to broadcasts,... |
|
| IRIS 2011-9:1/18 [FR] Wine Channel Contests Granting a Competitor a Broadcasting Convention | |
|
During the summer, the Conseil d’Etat received an application under the urgent procedure from Edonys, the international television channel devoted to wine, represented by Media Place Partners, which had been refused a broadcasting convention at the end of March 2011. The channel wishes to broadcast discussions and documentaries on the wine sector and to propose interactive tastings. However, this is not allowed under the “Evin Act” which bans all direct or indirect advertising in favour of alcohol (as stated in Article L. 3323-2 of the Public Health Code). Edonys called for the suspension of performance... |