Search results : 797
Refine your searchIRIS 1996-10:1/31 [GB] Satellite channel Rendez-vous banned | |
---|---|
Article 177 of the Broadcasting Act 1990 was invoked recently by the National Heritage Secretary under which a foreign satellite service may be proscribed if, in the view of the Independent Television Commission, it is regarded as unacceptable and the Secretary of State believes that the order is in the public interest and compatible with the UK's international obligations. The order, which must be laid before Parliament, was against Rendez-vous; it proscribes the service in the UK, i.e. it makes the supply of smart-cards and programme material, advertising for or on the channel or any other service... |
|
IRIS 1996-10:1/30 [GB] Implementation of the EC Copyright Directives | |
The UK Government made in its 1995 White Paper Competitiveness, Forging Ahead , the commitment to ensure that future EC legislation on copyright would promote the competitiveness of UK industry (para 15.39). Meanwhile, however, the UK has not yet implemented all the current (five) EC Copyright Directives. Until now two statutory instruments (SI) have been issued amending the 1988 Copyright Designs and Patents Act, so as to implement those directives. First, The Copyright (Computer Programs) Regulation 1992 (No 3233) implements the provisions of Council Directive No 91/250/EEC on the Legal Protection... |
|
IRIS 1996-10:1/17 [GB] Data stored in computer are "photographs" and activities in relation to data can be brought under Obscene Publications Act | |
A computer specialist at the University of Birmingham used the computer to which he had access in the course of his employment to store data which permitted him to display indecent pictures of children on the screen and make prints thereof. The question before the court was whether the images so stored constituted `photographs' under Section 1 of the Children Act 1978 and whether the distribution of the images was an offence under the 1959 and 1964 Obscene Publications Act. Generally, the question was: if these Acts were passed at a time that Parliament could not have envisaged the technical capabilities... |
|
IRIS 1996-10:1/16 [GB] When is an action alleging privacy against a broadcaster relevant? | |
The Barclay brothers, publishers of The European, sought to challenge the interpretation of Section 143 of the Broadcasting Act 1990, which refers to the power of the Broadcasting Complaints Commission to adjudicate on complaints alleging infringement of privacy arising out of programmes which had been broadcast. The question was: would it be competent to seek an adjudication in respect of material which had not yet been broadcast? What was the scope, in other words, of the adjudicative power of the BCC? The judge, who commented that in England and Wales there are no general constraints on the... |
|
IRIS 1996-10:1/5 State of Signatures and Ratifications on 1 November 1996 of the: European Convention on cinematographic co-production European Convention relating to questions on copyright law and neighbouring rights in the framework of transfrontier broadcasting by satellite | |
In IRIS 1996-5: 10 we published an overview of the State of Signatures and Ratifications of, inter alia, the European Convention on cinematographic co-production and the European Convention relating to questions on copyright law and neighbouring rights in the framework of transfrontier broadcasting by satellite. We can hereby report that Luxembourg ratfied the European Convention on cinematographic co-production on 21 June 1996 and that therefore, this Convention entered into force for Luxembourg on 1 October 1996. Furthermore, the United Kingdom signed the European Convention relating to questions... |