Search results : 1145
Refine your search| IRIS 2020-1:1/28 All tablet computers to be taxed at same rate for private copying | |
|---|---|
|
Private copying constitutes a well-known exception to copyright under Article L 122-5-2 of the Intellectual Property Code (which regulates authors’ rights) and Article L 211-3-2 (which regulates neighbouring rights). Authors of works that are copied in a non-commercial and non-professional context are entitled to compensatory remuneration, which is paid at source and collected directly from manufacturers and importers of digital media and recording devices used for copying. These companies add the tax to the purchase price paid by consumers. The Private Copying Committee, created under Article... |
|
| IRIS 2020-1:1/27 Definition of “insult” with regard to the violation of human dignity and parody | |
|
In a decision delivered on 25 October 2019, the highest formation of the Court of Cassation put an end to a dispute that had been going on for nearly eight years, defining the possible limits of insult (injure) with regard to the violation of human dignity on the one hand and the use of parody on the other. On Saturday, 7 January 2012, during the programme On n’est pas couché broadcast by France 2, the presenter, Laurent Ruquier, had displayed several posters parodying candidates in the French presidential election that had been published a few days earlier in the satirical... |
|
| IRIS 2020-1:1/24 CSA’s RT France warning confirmed | |
|
Having received an official warning from the French national audiovisual regulatory authority (Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel – CSA) in June 2018 after broadcasting a news report, RT France, the French-language outlet of the Russian international news channel RT, requested the retraction of the warning – which demanded that it respect its agreement with the CSA – on the grounds that the CSA had abused its powers. Article 2-3-6 of the channel’s agreement with the CSA (in the version applicable at the time) states: “The honesty requirement applies to... |
|
| IRIS 2019-10:1/16 [FR] Le Zapping/Vu: Canal Plus claims of “parasitism” by France Télévisions are dismissed | |
|
Canal Plus, which began broadcasting the programme “Le Zapping” in 1989, announced on 27 June 2016 that it would be pulling the plug on the programme after a total of 27 years on the air. Seven months later, France Télévisions launched “Vu”, a programme based on a series of very short clips from French television programmes. The programme was co-produced by the former producer of the Canal Plus programme, who had worked on “Le Zapping” from day one and had been dismissed by the pay-TV channel a few months before the programme was taken off the air. After writing to France Télévisions, warning it... |
|
| IRIS 2019-10:1/15 [FR] Invasion of an executive’s privacy in television reporting legitimated by the right to information | |
|
In 2016, during its “Envoyé Spécial” programme, France Télévisions broadcast a report on the crisis in milk production entitled “Sérieusement?! Lactalis: le beurre et l’argent du beurre” (“Really?! Lactalis – having its cake and eating it”). The CEO of Lactalis claimed that a sequence in the report mentioned the name of his holiday home, giving its exact location and showing aerial views of the property. Invoking invasion of privacy, he brought a claim against France Télévisions on the basis of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 9 of the French Civil Code, seeking... |