Search results : 76
Refine your search| IRIS 2012-7:1/5 Position of the Nordic Consumer Ombudsmen on Marketing in Social Media | |
|---|---|
|
On 3 May 2012 the Nordic Consumer Ombudsmen presented a Joint Position regarding marketing in social media. These kinds of guidelines are not legally binding, but are generally well regarded and relied upon by Swedish courts when determining good market practices. In the Joint Position, the Nordic Consumer Ombudsmen confirmed that Marknadsföringslagen (the Swedish Marketing Practices Act - MPA) is technology neutral and applies in full to social media. The Joint Position deals among other things with issues such as (i) unsolicited commercial messages, especially relating to Facebook as this was... |
|
| IRIS 2012-4:1/20 [DK] The ROJ TV case | |
|
In 1999 two private limited companies, established under Danish law with the purpose of broadcasting TV programmes targeted at Kurdish people obtained a license from the Danish television authorities to broadcast television programmes via satellite from Denmark. In 2003 the companies obtained permission to establish a new television channel under the name of ROJ TV. The channel’s headquarter was in Denmark where the editorial decisions were also taken. In the following years ROJ TV was several times accused of broadcasting programmes that promoted the Kurdish liberation movement PPK, by many regarded... |
|
| IRIS 2011-9:1/4 Court of Justice of the European Union: Judgment in RojTV/FRG Preliminary Ruling Procedure | |
|
On 22 September 2011, the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) published its judgment in the joined cases C-244/10 and C-245/10 following references for a preliminary ruling from the German Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court - BVerwG) concerning the interpretation of the ban on the broadcast of programmes that incite hatred, enshrined in Article 22a of the Television Without Frontiers Directive 89/552/EEC (now: Article 6 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive 2010/13/EU). The related national procedure concerned an order issued by the Bundesministerium des Innern... |
|
| IRIS 2011-7:1/3 Court of Justice of the European Union: Opinion in RojTV/FRG Preliminary Ruling Procedure | |
|
On 5 May 2011, Advocate General (AG) Bot gave his opinion to the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) in the joined cases C-244/10 and C-245/10. It concerned a reference for a preliminary ruling submitted by the German Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court - BVerwG) on the interpretation of the ban on the broadcast of programmes that incite to hatred, enshrined in Article 22a of the “Television Without Frontiers” Directive 89/552/EEC (TWF, now: Article 6 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive 2010/13/EU, AVMSD). The related national procedure concerned an order issued... |
|
| IRIS 2011-6:1/15 [DK] Calculation of Damage and Assessment of Evidence in Illegal File-Sharing Cases | |
|
In a recent landmark case the Danish Supreme Court decided the criteria for calculating compensation and damage in illegal file-sharing cases. The decision also contained an interesting reasoning regarding the assessment of evidence in these cases. The case concerned whether a person (A) by use of a software programme, Direct Connect, had made a large number of musical works available to the public from his computer in violation of the Copyright Act. The rightsholders had via a specially developed programme established contact with a certain IP address over a period of time and obtained computer-generated... |