Search results : 1372
Refine your searchIRIS 2013-10:1/15 [DE] Berlin-Brandenburg Administrative Court of Appeal Denies Right to Information on MPs’ Use of Spending Allowance | |
---|---|
In a decision of 12 September 2013, the Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Berlin-Brandenburg Administrative Court of Appeal - OVG) ruled, in summary appeal proceedings instigated under Article 146 of the Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung (Administrative Court Procedural Code - VwGO), that the constitutional right to information enshrined in Article 5(1)(2)(1) of the Grundgesetz (Basic Law - GG) does not apply to MPs’ use of their spending allowance. The journalist had asked the Bundestag (lower house of parliament) administration for information about which MPs had used the allowance to buy more... |
|
IRIS 2013-10:1/14 [DE] Rhineland-Palatinate Administrative Court of Appeal Finds “Hasseröder Männercamp” Product Placement Inadmissible | |
In a ruling of 22 August 2013 (case no. 2 A 10002/13.OVG), the Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz (Rhineland-Palatinate Administrative Court of Appeal - OVG) decided that the depiction of a brand of beer before and during the live broadcast of a football match on the Sat.1 television channel had constituted unlawful product placement in the sense of Article 7(7)(3) of the Rundfunkstaatsvertrag (Inter-State Broadcasting Agreement - RStV). During the broadcast of a UEFA Europa League match, in which the use of product placement had been mentioned, TV broadcaster Sat.1 had twice switched to the... |
|
IRIS 2013-10:1/2 European Court of Human Rights: Von Hannover no. 3 v. Germany | |
The European Court of Human Rights has delivered a new judgment regarding a complaint by Princess Caroline von Hannover that the German courts had not sufficiently protected her right to privacy as guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention, by giving too much weight to the right of the press as guaranteed by Article 5 of the German Constitution and Article 10 of the European Convention (see earlier also Von Hannover no. 1 v. Germany, IRIS 2004-8/2 and Von Hannover no. 2 v. Germany, IRIS 2012-3/1). This time the Princess of Monaco lodged an appeal in Strasbourg relating to the refusal by the German... |
|
IRIS 2013-9:1/13 [DE] Distribution System via Press Wholesalers Established in Competition Law | |
On 7 June 2013, the Bundesrat (upper house of parliament) adopted the Achtes Gesetz zur Änderung des Gesetzes gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen (Eighth Act Amending the Restraints on Competition Act - 8. GWB-ÄndG) (see IRIS 2012-4/100), which entered into force on 30 June 2013. Under the new version of the GWB, the ban on anti-competitive agreements does not apply to industry agreements between press publishing houses and press wholesalers. However, a condition of this exemption is that, under the agreements, press wholesalers distribute newspapers and magazines to retailers in a comprehensive, non-discriminatory... |
|
IRIS 2013-9:1/12 [DE] “Lookalike Advertising” Illegal Even Without Physical Resemblance | |
In a ruling of 14 August 2013, the Landgericht Köln (Cologne District Court - LG) decided that advertising using a double of a famous person can be inadmissible even if there is no similarity between the facial features and external appearance of the double and the famous person. The famous person may be recognisable thanks to other details that characterise the person concerned. The complaint concerned a TV commercial for the defendant, a furniture store, which included a scene from a TV quiz show in which a presenter wearing glasses and a dark suit had asked a contestant the “all-important question”... |