Search results : 1381
Refine your search| IRIS 2014-3:1/16 [DE] LG Hamburg Orders Google to Filter Search Results | |
|---|---|
| 
                                         According to media reports, the Landgericht Hamburg (Hamburg District Court) issued a decision on 24 January 2014 (case no. 324 O 264/11), ordering the search engine provider Google Inc. to remove from its search results six secretly taken photographs showing the plaintiff engaging in sexual acts with prostitutes. Third parties had taken the photographs illegally and first published them on the Internet in 2008. The person depicted had successfully taken court action to stop distribution of the images in 23 countries. Although he had also demanded several times that Google should prevent the...  | 
                                |
| IRIS 2014-3:1/15 [DE] BVerfG Considers “Crazy Woman” Comment Not Protected by Freedom of Expression | |
| 
                                         In a ruling of 11 December 2013 (1 BvR 194/13), the 3rd chamber of the First Senate of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court - BVerfG) decided that the description of somebody as a "durchgeknallte Frau" (“crazy woman”) on an Internet portal was not covered by the fundamental right to freedom of expression. The complainant, a former district administrator and member of the Bavarian parliament, posed for Playboy magazine at the end of 2006. The photos were published in 2007. The defendant in the original procedure had published the images on its website, along with a text containing...  | 
                                |
| IRIS 2014-3:1/14 [DE] Federal Administrative Court Finds Axel Springer’s Takeover of ProSiebenSat.1 Acceptable Under Media Law | |
| 
                                         In a judgment of 29 January 2014 (case no. 6 C 2.13), the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court - BVerwG) ruled that the plaintiff Axel Springer AG’s intended 2006 takeover of ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG was acceptable under media law and therefore decided in the last instance that the Bayerische Landeszentrale für neue Medien (Bavarian New Media Office - BLM) had been wrong to stop the takeover. In 2005, the plaintiff had wanted to take over ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG (the sole shareholder in broadcasters Sat.1, ProSieben, Kabel 1, 9Live and N24) and indicated this intention to the relevant...  | 
                                |
| IRIS 2014-3:1/13 [DE] Federal Supreme Court Clears Parents of Liability for Filesharing by Grown-Up Children | |
| 
                                         In a ruling of 8 January 2014 (case no. I ZR 1169/12), the first civil chamber of the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court - BGH) decided that parents were not liable for copyright infringements committed by their grown-up children if they had no actual knowledge of the offences. The plaintiffs, four major German record producers, had taken court action against the defendant. According to the charge, the defendant’s 20-year old stepson had made around 3,750 music files available via online filesharing sites in 2006. The rightsholders had written to the stepfather, demanding lawyers’ and caution...  | 
                                |
| IRIS 2014-3:1/12 [DE] Federal Supreme Court Allows Link between Product Sales and Competition in TV Advertisement | |
| 
                                         In a ruling of 12 December 2013 (case no. I ZR 192/12), the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court - BGH) decided that linking a competition to the sale of sweets in a television advertisement was admissible, provided the diligence requirement set out in Article 3(2)(3) of the Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (Unfair Competition Act - UWG) did not apply, since the advertisement was aimed not only at minors. The case concerned a TV commercial for a competition in which customers had to purchase the advertised sweets in order to take part. The advertisement showed the presenter Thomas Gottschalk...  |