Search results : 1348

Refine your search
Results display : Short Long
IRIS 2014-4:1/9 [DE] Hamburg Regional Court Prohibits RedTube Warnings

In a decision of 19 December 2013, the Landgericht Hamburg (Hamburg Regional Court - LG) issued a temporary order, preventing the company “The Archive AG” from continuing to issue warnings, in their current form, to RedTube users (see also IRIS 2014-1/19). On the one hand, the warnings influenced the relationship between RedTube and its customers, thereby violating the streaming portal’s right to carry on its trade. On the other, the warnings in their current form were unlawful because their wording was too vague. For example, they simply demanded that users refrain from watching a film, the rights...

IRIS 2014-4:1/8 [DE] Supreme Court Limits Forfeiture of Copyright Claims

In a ruling of 6 February 2014, the First Civil Chamber of the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court - BGH) decided that copyright claims are not, in principle, forfeited if rightsholders do not assert their rights over a period of many years (case no. I ZR 86/12). The plaintiffs had filed for an injunction and compensation against a broadcaster. The dispute concerned the use of images filmed by cameraman Herbert Ernst showing Peter Fechter’s attempted escape from the GDR, which the defendant had broadcast in programmes such as the Berliner Abendschau on 13 August 2010. The plaintiffs claimed...

IRIS 2014-3:1/21 [DE] New SWR Inter-State Agreement Enters Into Force

The new Staatsvertrag über den Südwestrundfunk (Inter-State Agreement on Südwestrundfunk, the public service broadcaster for the Länder of Baden-Württemberg and Rhineland-Palatinate - SWR-StV), entered into force on 1 January 2014. The purpose of the new agreement is to guarantee a strong, properly functioning SWR in a digitised media world for a younger, trimedial audience. To this end, the agreement gives SWR greater flexibility to create its own business structure and develop multimedia forms of organisation. SWR’s new legal framework in particular makes provision for the clarification of its...

IRIS 2014-3:1/20 [DE] Oldenburg Appeal Court Fines Newspaper’s Online Service EUR 10,000

According to media reports, the Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg (Oldenburg Appeal Court - OLG) fined the online service of a major daily newspaper EUR 10,000 in a ruling of 10 December 2013. The portal had published video footage of a police operation in which the faces of the police officers involved had not been pixellated. The videos showed a person being arrested during a police operation at a disco in Bremen on 23 June 2013. The police officers’ faces were clearly visible. A temporary injunction was issued against the online service on 26 August 2013, ordering it to make the officers unrecognisable. The...

IRIS 2014-3:1/19 [DE] Nuremberg Appeal Court on Inadmissibility of Multiple Cautions

In its final judgment of 12 November 2013 (case no. 3 U 348/13), the Oberlandesgericht Nürnberg (Nuremberg Appeal Court - OLG) ruled that an application for an injunction against a company, and for reimbursement of the cost of issuing a caution following a breach of the obligation to publish legal information on an Internet platform (in this case, Facebook), was inadmissible under Article 8(4) of the Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (Unfair Competition Act - UWG) if, taking all the circumstances into account, it represented an abuse of the law. The court considered that an abuse of the law...