Search results : 1375

Refine your search
Results display : Short Long
IRIS 2014-10:1/7 [DE] BGH permits use of illegally obtained e-mails for reporting purposes

In a ruling of 30 September 2014, which has not yet been published in full (case no. VI ZR 490/12), the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court - BGH) decided that the public’s right to information should take precedence over a politician’s general privacy rights. Although the judgment concerns print media, it is also relevant to reporting in the audiovisual media sector. The plaintiff held various political posts between 1994 and 2010, including that of Finance Minister, Home Affairs Minister, and Head of the State Chancellery of a German Bundesland. In 1997, he had a daughter from an extra-marital...

IRIS 2014-9:1/15 [DE] KJM presents broadcasting and telemedia cases from first half of 2014

On 18 August 2014, the Kommission für Jugendmedienschutz (Committee for Youth Protection in the Media – KJM) published a press release, in which it presented the cases it had examined during the first half of 2014 following alleged breaches of the Staatsvertrag über den Schutz der Menschenwürde und den Jugendschutz in Rundfunk und Telemedien (Inter-State Agreement on the Protection of Human Dignity and Minors in Broadcasting and Telemedia – JMStV). In order to monitor the broadcasting sector, the KJM relies on the staff of the Land media authorities, which evaluate possible breaches of the JMStV...

IRIS 2014-9:1/14 [DE] Federal Administrative Court rules that “Hasseröder Männercamp” did not breach advertising rules

In a ruling of 23 July 2014 (case no. 6 C 31.13), which has not yet been published, the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court – BVerwG) decided that the depiction of a brand of beer before and after the live broadcast of a football match on the SAT.1 television channel did not constitute unlawful product placement for the purposes of Article 7(7)(3) of the Rundfunkstaatsvertrag (Inter-State Broadcasting Agreement – RStV). During the broadcast of a football match, in which the use of product placement had been mentioned, the TV broadcaster SAT.1 had twice switched to the so-called...

IRIS 2014-9:1/13 [DE] Constitutional Court rules on courtroom reporting restrictions

In a decision of 31 July 2014 (case no. 1 BvR 1858/14), the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court – BVerfG) partially upheld an application for a temporary injunction against a procedural order restricting press reporting on a criminal procedure before the Landgericht Hamburg (Hamburg District Court – LG). In the criminal procedure, which concerned a three-year old girl who had died from internal injuries, the LG Hamburg had issued several orders. Firstly, audio, photographic, and video recordings in the courtroom could only be made by a pool of two camera teams (one private and...

IRIS 2014-9:1/3 European Court of Human Rights: Axel Springer AG v. Germany (No. 2)

In a judgment of 10 July 2014, the European Court found that the publication by the daily newspaper Bild of suspicions concerning the former German Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder, was covered by journalistic freedom. In Strasbourg, the publisher of Bild, Axel Springer AG, had lodged a complaint arguing that the German courts had interfered with the right to freedom of expression and critical press reporting in a way that violated Article 10 of the Convention.  An article in Bild had repeated a series of suspicions and doubts on the part of Mr Thiele – the deputy president of the...