Search results : 1372
Refine your searchIRIS 2016-9:1/2 Court of Justice of the European Union: Judgment on the case Tobias Mc. Fadden v. Sony Music Entertainment GmbH | |
---|---|
On 15 September 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Tobias Mc Fadden v. Sony Music Entertainment Germany GmbH, concerning the application of the intermediary liability regime under the E-Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC (ECD) to the operator of a shop which offers access to a Wi-Fi network free of charge to the public in relation to copyright infringements committed by users of that network. Mr. Tobias Mc Fadden runs a shop selling and leasing lighting and sound systems, in which he offers access to a Wi-Fi network to the general public free of charge... |
|
IRIS 2016-9:1/1 European Court of Human Rights: Brambilla and others v. Italy | |
The legality and acceptability of some controversial practices by journalists was at the heart of a recent case before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The case concerns the conviction of three journalists in Italy who intercepted radio communications between police officers (carabinieri) in order to arrive quickly at crime scenes and report on them for their local online newspaper. Stressing the notion of responsible journalism and noting that the decisions of the domestic courts had been duly reasoned and had focused primarily on the need to protect national security and prevent crime... |
|
IRIS 2016-8:1/15 [DE] Who is entitled to the “kickback discounts” received by a media agency? | |
In its decision of 16 June 2016, on a final appeal on points of law in a dispute between Haribo and the media agency Mediaplus (Case III ZR 282/14), the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice - BGH) set aside the judgment of the Oberlandesgericht München (Munich Higher Regional Court - OLG München) of 23 August 2014 (Case 7 U 4376/13). OLG München had previously ruled that there was no obligation to disclose information and accordingly held that Mediaplus was entitled to the bulk advertising discounts and referred the case back to the appeals court for retrial and a new decision. In a multistage... |
|
IRIS 2016-8:1/14 [DE] Users must be informed by manufacturers about data transfer in the case of smart TVs | |
According to the Landgericht Frankfurt (Frankfurt Regional Court) in a judgment of 10 June 2016 (Case 2-03 O 364/15), manufacturers of smart TVs must provide consumers with better information about the gathering of personal data and must not issue any unreasonably long terms and conditions or privacy policy. The defendant was a manufacturer of internet-enabled smart TVs that operate on the HbbTV standard, which is usually activated by pressing the “red button”. The HbbTV function was installed and switched on when the smart TVs were delivered. The defendant’s smart TVs also feature a user interface... |
|
IRIS 2016-8:1/13 [DE] Hamburg Regional Court prohibits repetition of “abusive criticism” | |
In a decision of 17 May 2016 (Case 324 O 255/16), the Landgericht Hamburg (Hamburg Regional Court) issued an injunction against TV presenter Jan Böhrmermann prohibiting him from repeating large parts of an “abusive poem” that he read out in a TV programme. In addition to a criminal prosecution, the President of Turkey had made an application under civil law in fast-track proceedings to stop the presenter from repeating the poem. The satirist had read out a poem about the Turkish President entitled “Schmähkritik” (“abusive criticism”) in his TV show “Neo Magazin Royale”, which was rebroadcast on... |