Search results : 1372

Refine your search
Results display : Short Long
IRIS 2018-10:1/9 [DE] Federal Supreme Court refers ‘Uploaded’ to ECJ

On 20 September 2018, a week after issuing its YouTube decision (IRIS 2018-9/10), the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court – BGH) decided to refer a similar set of questions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) concerning the liability of a shared web hosting service for copyright infringements (Case no. I ZR 53/17 – Uploaded). The case follows a dispute between book and music publishers and the shared hosting service Uploaded, which offers free storage space for anyone to upload files that can, in principle, be downloaded free of charge by other users. Registered users can pay for higher...

IRIS 2018-10:1/8 [DE] Federal Supreme Court: broadcaster not obliged to search YouTube for illegal content

In a decision of 12 July 2018 (Case no. I ZB 86/17), which was published on 28 September 2018, the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court - BGH) ruled that a broadcaster had fulfilled its obligations by removing a TV programme from its online media library and taking steps to ensure that it could not be retrieved from the cache of common search engines, and in particular from Google. The case concerned a television programme broadcast in April 2017 by public service broadcaster Norddeutscher Rundfunk (NDR) which had been the subject of a preliminary injunction on account of infringements of the...

IRIS 2018-10:1/5 Advocate General: German broadcasting fee is not unlawful state aid

In his opinion delivered on 26 September 2018 in Case C-492/17, Advocate General Manuel Campos Sánchez-Bordona proposed that the Court of Justice declare that the amendment of the event triggering the chargeability of the broadcasting fee used to finance public service broadcasting in Germany does not constitute unlawful state aid. In a 2007 ruling, the Commission had stated that the method for financing public service broadcasting in Germany - then known as the ‘Rundfunkgebühr’ (broadcasting fee) - could be classified as ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of EU law. This means that the aid existed...

IRIS 2018-10:1/2 European Court of Human Rights: Annen (No. 2 and 5) v. Germany

Yet again, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has been requested to balance the right to reputation and the right to freedom of expression with regard to Internet content. The cases of Annen v. Germany are about a series of interferences with the right to freedom of expression of Klaus Günter Annen, a campaigner against abortion who also operates an anti-abortion website. While the other cases deal with distributing leaflets and campaigning in the immediate vicinity of medical practices and clinics where abortions are performed, two of the cases concern injunctions against Annen, as well...

IRIS 2018-9:1/10 [DE] BGH refers questions to ECJ concerning YouTube’s liability for copyright breaches

In a decision of 13 September 2018 (Case no. I ZR 140/15 - YouTube), the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Supreme Court - BGH) referred a number of questions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for a preliminary decision concerning the liability of the YouTube Internet video platform operator for copyright breaches linked to content uploaded by third parties. The case follows a claim brought by a music producer after a YouTube user had uploaded several videos containing musical works by the singer Sarah Brightman. The producer claimed that he had produced one of the albums featured in the videos and...