Search results : 1348

Refine your search
Results display : Short Long
IRIS 1996-2:1/13 [DE] Bavarian Constitutional Court makes provisional order in H.O.T. case

The lawfulness of the H.O.T. teleshopping channel has already been disputed several times in the German courts ( see IRIS 1995-9:13, IRIS 1996-1:5). H.O.T. was initially authorised to broadcast on cable in Bavaria, and was later able to reach a national audience via satellite. RTL plus Fernsehen GmbH & Co KG (the applicant) tried to stop the programme from being shown on cable in Bavaria by seeking a provisional injunction from the Bavarian Administative Court, ordering the licensing authority (BLM) to prohibit provisionally the teleshopping programmes being fed into the Munich and Nuremberg cable...

IRIS 1996-2:1/12 [DE] Court prohibits violence on television at certain viewing times

The Administrative Court in Frankfurt-am-Main recently upheld the decision of the regional Private Broadcasting Authority of Hesse forbidding the private television channel RTL 2 to show the "World Wrestling Federation" programme before 21.00. In so doing, it gave protection of the young priority over the interests of the broadcaster. RTL 2s appeal against this decision was rejected by the Administrative Court of Appeal in Kassel. The court considers showing of the "wrestling programme" in the afternoon (16.00-17.00) a danger to young people. The decision is based on Section 21, sub-section 2,...

IRIS 1996-1:1/23 [DE] "Negative list" of the heads of the government of the federal Länder on the concept of broadcasting

The interpretation of the concept of broadcasting has been the subject of discussion in Germany for some time (see IRIS-6:9). At the heart of the problem is the treatment of the new media. Broadcasting is defined in Article 2 of the Agreement on Broadcasting between the Federal States in United Germany (RStV) as presentation and dissemination to the general public of performances of any kind in words, sound or pictures using electrical vibrations with a conductor or without a connecting conductor. This raises the problem of the position of multi-media services. In particular there is the question...

IRIS 1996-1:1/10 [DE] Discussion on the authorization of the first German tele-shopping channel (H.O.T.)

IRIS 1995-9:13 included a report on the authorisation of HOT (Home Order Television) tele-shopping programmes by the Bavarian Central Office for New Media ( Bayerische Landeszentrale für Neue Medien BLM). This authorisation in Bavaria was challenged by RTL+, and as a result of provisional legal protection proceedings before the Munich Administrative Court the BLM was obliged to provisionally prohibit inclusion in the Bavarian cable network. The claim was based on the opinion that the authorisation did not comply with Article 27-3 of the Agreement on Broadcasting between the Federal States in United...

IRIS 1996-1:1/3 [DE] Discussion on the legal responsibility of on-line services and companies offering access to Internet

Following suspicion of the circulation of pornography among newsgroups on Internet, the State Prosecution Service in Munich instigated investigation proceedings against the German subsidiary of the on-line service CompuServe. These began with the impounding of private computers whose mailboxes were found to contain pornographic material. It is the view of the State Prosecution Service that the company CompuServe bears joint responsibility for the data circulating in its data network. In order to prevent offences being committed, checks must be made, using all available technical means, on whether...