Search results : 240
Refine your search| IRIS 2004-6:1/8 European Commission: 6 Member States Referred to Court of Justice over Electronic Communications Framework | |
|---|---|
|
On 21 April 2004, the European Commission announced its decision to refer to the European Court of Justice the six Member States that had still not fully implemented the new regulatory framework for electronic communications into their national law (i.e. Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands). The new framework was to be implemented by July 2003, but 8 Member States failed to meet this deadline and in October 2003 the Commission opened infringement proceedings against those States (see IRIS 2003-10: 5 and IRIS 2004-2: 4). Proceedings against two Member States, Spain (see... |
|
| IRIS 2004-5:1/32 [BE/FR] Co-production Agreement between Belgium’s French Community and France | |
|
On 16 May 2004, Belgium’s French Community and the French Republic signed a two-year renewable agreement aimed at supporting the co-production of cinematographic works. This replaces the 1962 agreement on cinematographic relations. According to the agreement, cinematographic works co-produced in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in it are regarded as domestically produced and thus reap the benefits associated with this classification. The conditions for enjoying these benefits are as follows: works must have been approved by each party’s competent authorities (the Centre du Cinéma... |
|
| IRIS 2003-9:1/10 [BE] Modifications to the Broadcasting Act regarding the Competences of the Media Authority and the Right of Reply | |
|
By its Decree of 4 June 2003, the Flemish Parliament has retransferred the competence on licensing of radio broadcasters to the Flemish Government. The licensing of private radio stations in the Flemish Community was transferred in 1998 to the Vlaams Commissariaat voor de Media (Flemish Media Authority) as a depoliticization of the procedures of radio licensing, which until 1998 were decided upon by the Flemish Government and the Minister responsible (see IRIS 1998-9: 9). Recent practice however and new developments in policy are the bases of the decision to retransfer the decision making role... |
|
| IRIS 2003-7:1/10 [BE] New Broadcasting Decree | |
|
On 17 April the long-awaited new decree on broadcasting came into force in the French-speaking Community of Belgium, replacing the old decree on the audio-visual sector dating back to 17 July 1987 and the decree of 24 July 1997 on the audio-visual regulatory body (Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel CSA) and private radio broadcasting services in the French-speaking Community (see IRIS 1997-8: 14). The new decree encompasses all the legislation on the audio-visual sector in the French-speaking Community with the exception of the public-sector service (RTBF), which remains governed by the decree... |
|
| IRIS 2003-6:1/11 [BE] First Decision of Council for Journalism - No Infringement of Journalistic Ethics by Commercial Television | |
|
In December 2002, the Council of Ethics of the Belgian Association of Professional Journalists was replaced, in the Flemish Community, by the Raad voor de Journalistiek (Council for Journalism). Journalists, publishers and broadcasting organisations are represented in the new Council. 6 of the 18 members have been co-opted from among judges and academics. The Council is a self-regulatory body without any disciplinary power. Its decisions are made public and are intended to encourage compliance with journalistic ethics. The first case decided by the new Council for Journalism concerns an interview... |