Search results : 499
Refine your searchIRIS 2001-4:1/25 [BE] User Punished for Child Pornography on the Net; ISPs Not Convicted | |
---|---|
In a judgment of 17 November 2000, the Hasselt Criminal Court convicted a person who was found in possession of pictures and software containing images of sexual behaviour of a pornographic character featuring minors aged under 16. He was convicted under Article 383bis of the Criminal Code. Two Internet Service Providers (ISPs) whose infrastructure and services had been used to distribute and receive the illegal content on the Internet were not convicted. The Court referred to the basic rules of the Belgian Collaboration Protocol to Help Stamp Out Illegal Acts on the Internet (see IRIS 1999-7:... |
|
IRIS 2001-3:1/21 [NL] Transposition of EC Directive on Comparative Advertising | |
By means of an amendment to the Burgerlijk Wetboek (Civil Code), Directive 97/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 1997 amending Directive 84/450/EEC concerning misleading advertising so as to include comparative advertising was transposed into Dutch law. The Directive states that comparative advertising is, in principle, admissible in the European Community, provided a number of carefully defined criteria are met. In order to transpose the Directive, an new Article 194a was added to the Dutch Civil Code, defining comparative advertising and explaining under what conditions... |
|
IRIS 2001-2:1/34 [NL] Real Estate Database Not Protected by the Dutch Database Act | |
The Court of Appeal of the Hague has ruled that an on-line database set up by an organisation of real estate brokers and containing information on real estate property that is for sale, is not protected by the Databankenwet (Database Act). The Databankenwet, an implementation of the European Database Directive, requires a "substantial investment" to be made by the owner of the database. Considering that the database was created for the organisation's internal purposes prior to on-line publication, the Court judged that there had not been a substantial investment by the organisation. Therefore,... |
|
IRIS 2001-1:1/34 [NL] Non-discriminatory Cable Access - MCM v. CasTel et al. | |
A number of decisions on access for broadcasters to cable infrastructures have been taken recently in the Netherlands. The Onafhankelijke Post en Telecommunicatie Autoriteit (Independent Post and Telecommunications Authority - OPTA) has repeatedly decided that cable network operators should not be allowed simply to refuse cable access for certain channels. The case between broadcaster MCM and regional cable network operator CasTel concerned the latter's transmission and fees policies. MCM asked CasTel to carry its Muzzik channel. At the same time, MCM demanded that, if CasTel agreed to this request,... |
|
IRIS 2001-1:1/22 [NL] RTL4 and RTL5 May Continue Broadcasting in the Netherlands for the Time Being | |
The Chairman of the Administrative Division of the Council of State decided, in response to an appeal by the Holland Media Groep (Holland Media Group - HMG), that the programs of RTL and RTL5 are - for the time beingconsidered to come under the jurisdiction of Luxembourg and therefore may be transmitted in the Netherlands without a Dutch broadcasting licence. HMG, a commercial broadcasting corporation that broadcasts television programs for RTL4 and RTL5, first lodged an appeal to the Administrative Division against a decree of the District Court of Amsterdam on 7 September 2000, (case 98/3461,... |