Search results : 501

On 18 July 2022, the State Secretary for Culture and Media (Staatssecretaris Cultuur en Media) introduced a new Bill to the Lower House of Parliament (Tweede Kamer), which will amend the Media Act (Mediawet) 2008, and impose an obligation on major streaming platforms to invest in Dutch audiovisual productions. The State Secretary also announced in a Letter to Parliament a series of new measures to strengthen the Dutch audiovisual sector. Crucially, a new Article 3.29e will be inserted into the Media Act, requiring providers of on-demand audiovisual media services to invest in Dutch audiovisual...

On 18 May 2022, the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Amsterdam Court) () delivered a notable judgment regarding the liability of an internet platform for fake advertisements featuring the portrait or name of famous persons that seemingly promotes investment methods via cryptocurrencies. The case, which has received considerable media coverage, was brought to the Court by the Vladimir Foundation, founded by well-known Dutch figures. It aims to combat public deception by means of fake news or misleading advertisements featuring notable figures. The Court held that Google may not be held liable for these advertisements....

On 17 May 2022, the Commissariaat voor de Media (Dutch Media Authority) announced that as of 1 July 2022, "influential video-uploaders" will have to ensure their compliance with the Mediawet (Media Act). The new "Policy Rule for the qualification of commercial on-demand services 2022" clarifies which video-uploaders must register with the Media Authority and will be subject to "active monitoring". It is nothing new that entities uploading videos to video-sharing platforms may fall within the scope of the revised EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD) (see...

On 16 March 2022, the Amsterdam Court (Rechtbank Amsterdam) delivered a notable judgment regarding a copyright infringement and an unlawful allegation in an episode published on a popular YouTube channel. The channel is described as a ‘juice channel’, where the creators usually discuss the latest gossip and news concerning famous Dutch people. The Court ruled that uploading the video, which contained an unreleased song as well as the discussion surrounding it regarding allegations of sexual misconduct, without the consent of the claimant, was considered unlawful, and the channel had...

On 29 April 2022, the District Court of Amsterdam (Rechtbank Amsterdam) delivered an important judgment on whether a social media influencer is entitled to invoke the right to protection of journalistic sources. Notably, the Court held that the activities of a Dutch social media influencer, with over 400 000 followers on Instagram and YouTube, fell within the concept of “journalism”, and the influencer was entitled not to reveal her sources in legal proceedings over an online video. The case centred on the well-known Dutch influencer Yvonne Coldeweijer (the defendant), who operates...