Romania
[RO] Public Information Guidelines Supplemented
IRIS 2004-3:1/32
Mariana Stoican
Journalist, Bucharest
Decision No. 274 of the Consiliului National al Audiovizualului (National Audiovisual Council, the supervisory body for electronic media in Romania CNA) of 25 September 2003 on correct public information (see IRIS 2003-10: 15) was amended and completed at the end of 2003. CNA Decision No. 377 states that certain occupational groups may no longer make or present informative audiovisual programmes in the electronic media. The newly added para. 3 of Article 1 of the decision lists the following categories: a.) MPs; b.) representatives of national and local public administration; c.) representatives of the presidency; d.) political party officials; e.) people who, either independently or on behalf of a political party, have publicly announced their intention to stand in local, parliamentary or presidential elections. In accordance with Art. 91 of Audiovisual
Act No. 504/2002, any breach of these rules will be punished first by a public reprimand and, for subsequent offences, a fine of between ROL 25 million and
ROL 250 million (EUR 1 is worth approximately ROL 41,000).
One Romanian TV presenter affected by this decision is the Chairman of the Senate Committee for Culture and Media, who produces a talk show on a private TV channel. The person concerned believes this decision infringes his right to carry out his occupation freely and has appealed to the Curtea de Apel Bucuresti (Bucharest Appeal Court) to quash the decision. He has also claimed the symbolic sum of ROL 2 in moral damages (" Daune morale ").
References
- Decizia nr. 377 Consiliului National al Audiovizualului pentru modificarea si completarea Deciziei nr. 274 din 25 septembrie 2003 privind asigurarea informarii corecte a opiniei publice, Publicata in Monitorul Oficial nr. 7 din 7 ianuarie 2004
- CNA Decision No. 377 of 11 December 2003 amending and completing Decision No. 274 of 25 September 2003 on correct public information, OJ No.7 of 7 January 2004
This article has been published in IRIS Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual Observatory.