Search results : 487
Refine your searchIRIS 2024-9:1/13 [NL] Dutch regulators recommend new measures to protect children from influencer advertising | |
---|---|
On 7 October 2024, the Samenwerkingsplatform Digitale Toezichthouders (Dutch Digital Supervisory Cooperation Platform – SDT), which is comprised of four major Dutch regulatory authorities, published a significant recommendation that additional measures are needed to protect children and young people from social media influencer marketing. The SDT is an important regulatory cooperation platform established in 2022 by the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM), the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets, the Dutch Data Protection Authority, and the Dutch Media Authority... |
|
IRIS 2024-9:1/21 [NL] The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets publishes the DSA Guidelines for providers of intermediary services | |
On 12 September 2024, the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (Autoriteit Consument en Markt – ACM) published its Guidelines on due diligence obligations for providers of intermediary services under the Digital Services Act (DSA). These Guidelines aim to assist Dutch companies in navigating the complex legal landscape introduced by the DSA. They are also expected to facilitate the implementation and enforcement of the DSA in the Netherlands. The provisions of the DSA have applied to all providers of intermediary services since 17 February 2024. However, much uncertainty... |
|
IRIS 2024-8:1/12 [NL] Public broadcaster’s interview using false pretences seriously violated journalistic standards | |
On 12 July 2024, the Ombudsman of the Dutch Public Broadcasting Foundation (Stichting Nederlandse Publieke Omroep) issued a significant decision on a recent controversial interview conducted by the public broadcaster PowNed. Notably, the Ombudsman held that the interview violated the Journalistic Code of Conduct and could be “damaging to the trust in journalism as a whole, and in public broadcasting in particular”. The case garnered considerable public debate, with the broadcaster admitting it was a “tasteless item” and was “completely disrespectful to women in general”.... |
|
IRIS 2024-8:1/13 [NL] Online news outlet’s proceedings over suspension from YouTube monetisation programme | |
On 2 August 2024, the Amsterdam District Court (Rechtbank Amsterdam) delivered a significant judgment on YouTube’s suspension of an online news outlet from YouTube’s monetisation programme, over the channel’s “misleading content”, including on the climate crisis. Notably, the Court rejected the news outlet’s claim that there had been a violation of its right to freedom of expression, and said YouTube had the freedom to create an “advertising-friendly environment”, where certain channels are deemed “unsuitable for advertising” over misleading... |
|
IRIS 2024-8:1/22 [NL] District Court of Amsterdam rules that X has violated the DSA and the GDPR by “shadowbanning” its user | |
On 5 July 2024, the District Court of Amsterdam (Rechtbank Amsterdam) declared that Twitter International Unlimited Company – the Irish subsidiary of X – violated Articles 12 and 17 of the Digital Services Act (DSA) by failing to designate a single point of contact for recipients of its services and silently hiding its user’s account from search suggestions (the practice also known as ‘shadowbanning’). The proceedings were initiated by the Dutch entrepreneur and PhD student Danny Mekić, who has a paid X Premium subscription. In October 2023, he made a post criticising... |